dopamine
in review
2 min read
Updated 2026-08-16
Contents
dopamine
Dose-dependent D1 → beta-1 → alpha-1 agonist and endogenous precursor of norepinephrine. Largely superseded — SOAP II showed twice the arrhythmia rate versus norepinephrine and higher mortality in cardiogenic shock. Retains a small role in symptomatic bradycardia. The “renal dose” myth is dead.
mechanism
| dose | dominant receptor | effect |
|---|---|---|
| 1–5 mcg/kg/min | D1 (renal, splanchnic) | vasodilation, ↑renal blood flow, natriuresis — no clinical benefit |
| 5–10 mcg/kg/min | beta-1 | ↑contractility, ↑HR, ↑CO |
| >10 mcg/kg/min | alpha-1 | vasoconstriction, ↑SVR, ↑MAP |
dose–receptor ranges overlap substantially
Receptor selectivity by dose is a teaching construct, not a reliable bedside phenomenon — you cannot predict which effect you’ll get in a given patient.
Net haemodynamics: ↑↑HR, ↑CO, ↑MAP, ↑SVR (at higher doses)
dosing
- Range: 2–20 mcg/kg/min
- Symptomatic bradycardia (ACLS): 5–20 mcg/kg/min, second-line after atropine, alongside epinephrine 2–10 mcg/min and pacing
- PK: onset ~5 min · half-life ~2 min · metabolised by MAO/COMT
- Caution with MAOIs — markedly prolonged and exaggerated effect; reduce dose substantially
key points
- Symptomatic bradycardia unresponsive to atropine is its main surviving niche (ACLS algorithm)
- “Renal dose” dopamine is dead — Bellomo, Lancet. 2000 showed no renal protection, no reduction in RRT, no survival benefit
- If a question offers dopamine vs norepinephrine for shock, norepinephrine wins — SOAP II and arrhythmias
- Endocrine/immune effects: suppresses prolactin and TSH, blunts hypoxic ventilatory drive, may impair T-cell function
adverse effects
- Tachyarrhythmia — the headline problem: AF, SVT, VT (~24% vs 12% with norepi in SOAP II)
- ↑Mortality in cardiogenic shock vs norepinephrine
- Extravasation necrosis — phentolamine
- Tachyphylaxis with prolonged use
evidence
- SOAP II (2010) — vs norepinephrine in 1,679 shock patients: no overall mortality difference, but ~2x arrhythmic events (24% vs 12%) and higher 28-day mortality in the cardiogenic shock subgroup. Practice-changing
- Bellomo, Lancet. 2000 — low-dose dopamine did not prevent renal dysfunction, reduce RRT, or improve survival
- Meta-analyses consistently favour norepinephrine over dopamine in septic shock