This content has not yet been reviewed and may contain errors.

dopamine

in review 2 min read Updated 2026-08-16
Contents
dopamine

Dose-dependent D1 → beta-1 → alpha-1 agonist and endogenous precursor of norepinephrine. Largely superseded — SOAP II showed twice the arrhythmia rate versus norepinephrine and higher mortality in cardiogenic shock. Retains a small role in symptomatic bradycardia. The “renal dose” myth is dead.


mechanism

dosedominant receptoreffect
1–5 mcg/kg/minD1 (renal, splanchnic)vasodilation, ↑renal blood flow, natriuresis — no clinical benefit
5–10 mcg/kg/minbeta-1↑contractility, ↑HR, ↑CO
>10 mcg/kg/minalpha-1vasoconstriction, ↑SVR, ↑MAP
dose–receptor ranges overlap substantially

Receptor selectivity by dose is a teaching construct, not a reliable bedside phenomenon — you cannot predict which effect you’ll get in a given patient.

Net haemodynamics: ↑↑HR, ↑CO, ↑MAP, ↑SVR (at higher doses)


dosing

  • Range: 2–20 mcg/kg/min
  • Symptomatic bradycardia (ACLS): 5–20 mcg/kg/min, second-line after atropine, alongside epinephrine 2–10 mcg/min and pacing
  • PK: onset ~5 min · half-life ~2 min · metabolised by MAO/COMT
  • Caution with MAOIs — markedly prolonged and exaggerated effect; reduce dose substantially

key points

  • Symptomatic bradycardia unresponsive to atropine is its main surviving niche (ACLS algorithm)
  • “Renal dose” dopamine is deadBellomo, Lancet. 2000 showed no renal protection, no reduction in RRT, no survival benefit
  • If a question offers dopamine vs norepinephrine for shock, norepinephrine wins — SOAP II and arrhythmias
  • Endocrine/immune effects: suppresses prolactin and TSH, blunts hypoxic ventilatory drive, may impair T-cell function

adverse effects

  • Tachyarrhythmia — the headline problem: AF, SVT, VT (~24% vs 12% with norepi in SOAP II)
  • ↑Mortality in cardiogenic shock vs norepinephrine
  • Extravasation necrosis — phentolamine
  • Tachyphylaxis with prolonged use

evidence

  • SOAP II (2010) — vs norepinephrine in 1,679 shock patients: no overall mortality difference, but ~2x arrhythmic events (24% vs 12%) and higher 28-day mortality in the cardiogenic shock subgroup. Practice-changing
  • Bellomo, Lancet. 2000 — low-dose dopamine did not prevent renal dysfunction, reduce RRT, or improve survival
  • Meta-analyses consistently favour norepinephrine over dopamine in septic shock

Key references