valvular heart disease

7 min read Updated 2026-04-13
Contents
valvular heart disease

TTE is the initial diagnostic test for all valvular disease. The core clinical question is when to intervene — know the Class I indications for each lesion. Management is largely surgical/interventional once thresholds are met; medical therapy is temporising, not definitive. Prosthetic valve anticoagulation depends on valve type and position.


quick recognition

LesionClassic clueAuscultation
aortic stenosisexertional syncope, angina, dyspnoea in elderlycrescendo-decrescendo systolic murmur → right upper sternal border, radiating to carotids
aortic regurgitationwide pulse pressure, bounding pulses, early diastolic murmurblowing early diastolic murmur → left sternal border
mitral stenosisrheumatic fever history, AF, haemoptysislow-pitched diastolic rumble → apex, opening snap
mitral regurgitationholosystolic murmur → axilla, acute MR in MI settingblowing holosystolic murmur → apex

aortic stenosis

severity criteria

ParameterMildModerateSevereVery severe
peak jet velocity (m/s)2.0–2.93.0–3.9≥4.0>5.0
mean gradient (mmHg)<2020–39≥40
AVA (cm²)>1.51.0–1.5<1.0

Class I indications for replacement

  • severe symptomatic AS (dyspnoea, syncope, angina)
  • severe asymptomatic AS with LVEF <50%
  • severe asymptomatic AS undergoing other cardiac surgery
  • symptomatic low-flow low-gradient AS (reduced or preserved EF) — see below

low-flow low-gradient AS

Two distinct entities:

classical LFLGparadoxical LFLG
EFreduced (<50%)preserved (≥50%)
mechanismLV can’t generate gradientsmall hypertrophied LV, low stroke volume
diagnostic testdobutamine stress echo — true severe AS shows AVA stays <1.0 cm² with ↑gradientCT aortic valve calcium score (dobutamine not helpful — EF already normal)
calcium score threshold≥2000 AU (men), ≥1200 AU (women) suggests true severe AS

medical management cautions

haemodynamic traps in severe AS
  • avoid vasodilators (ACEi, ARBs, nitrates) in symptomatic severe AS — can precipitate cardiovascular collapse
  • avoid excessive preload reduction — these patients are preload-dependent yet vulnerable to pulmonary oedema
  • if intubation required: have vasopressors running before induction, minimise PEEP, use haemodynamically stable agents
ACEi/ARBs in asymptomatic AS

Not absolutely contraindicated — can be used for hypertension in asymptomatic AS with careful monitoring. The danger is in symptomatic severe disease.

  • vasopressor choice: phenylephrine (maintains coronary perfusion, reflexive bradycardia helps diastolic filling) or norepinephrine (mild inotropy without excessive tachycardia)
  • avoid tachycardia — shortens diastolic filling time across the fixed obstruction

monitoring (asymptomatic)

SeverityEcho interval
mildevery 3–5 years
moderateevery 1–2 years
severeevery 6–12 months

aortic regurgitation

Class I indications for surgery

  • severe symptomatic AR
  • severe asymptomatic AR with LVEF ≤55%
  • severe AR undergoing other cardiac surgery

Class IIa

  • severe asymptomatic AR with LV end-systolic dimension >50 mm (or >25 mm/m²)

management

  • target SBP <140 mmHg
  • standard HFrEF management if LV dysfunction develops
  • afterload reduction does not substitute for surgery when thresholds are met
  • TAVR is not an option for isolated chronic AR (insufficient calcification for valve anchoring)

mitral stenosis

  • almost exclusively rheumatic in origin
  • severe MS: MVA ≤1.5 cm²

anticoagulation

no DOACs in rheumatic MS

INVICTUS (2022) — rivaroxaban was inferior to warfarin in rheumatic heart disease with AF. Higher rates of death, stroke, and systemic embolism.

VKA anticoagulation required if:

  • rheumatic MS + AF
  • prior embolic event (regardless of rhythm)
  • LA thrombus

intervention

PMBC (percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy) — Class I:

  • severe symptomatic MS + favourable valve anatomy

Contraindications to PMBC:

  • LA thrombus
  • greater than moderate MR
  • unfavourable anatomy (heavy calcification, subvalvular fusion)

medical management

  • rate control is critical — longer diastole = more filling time across the stenotic valve
  • diuretics for congestion
  • avoid tachycardia (exercise, AF with rapid ventricular response)

mitral regurgitation

primary (degenerative) MR

Pathology of the valve apparatus (leaflets, chordae, papillary muscles). Most common: myxomatous degeneration / mitral valve prolapse. Severe = EROA ≥0.4 cm².

Class I indications for surgery:

  • severe symptomatic primary MR
  • severe asymptomatic primary MR with LVEF ≤60% or LVESD ≥40 mm

Repair is preferred over replacement when feasible — should be performed at experienced centres with <1% operative mortality.

secondary (functional) MR

Structurally normal leaflets; MR results from LV or LA dilatation causing annular distortion and leaflet malcoaptation. Severe = EROA ≥0.2 cm² (lower threshold than primary MR).

Management sequence:

  1. maximise GDMT (including SGLT2 Inhibitors, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists)
  2. CRT if indicated
  3. percutaneous MV repair (MitraClip) if symptomatic despite maximal GDMT + LVEF 20–50%
COAPT vs MITRA-FR

COAPT (2018) showed benefit of MitraClip in secondary MR with strict selection (disproportionate MR relative to LV size, on maximal GDMT). MITRA-FR (2018) was neutral — likely enrolled patients with proportionate MR and less optimised medical therapy. Key lesson: patient selection matters.


prosthetic valve anticoagulation

Valve typeAnticoagulationTarget INR
mechanical — any positionlifelong Warfarin
mechanical AVR (current gen, no risk factors)Warfarin2.5 (range 2.0–3.0)
mechanical MVR or AVR + risk factorsWarfarin3.0 (range 2.5–3.5)
ON-X aorticWarfarin + low-dose ASA1.5–2.0
bioprostheticlifelong ASA 75–100 mg
bioprosthetic (post-surgical)consider VKA INR 2.5 for first 3–6 months2.5
no DOACs for mechanical valves

Increased thrombotic and bleeding events. This is absolute — no exceptions regardless of position.

  • add ASA to mechanical valve anticoagulation only if separate antiplatelet indication (e.g. recent ACS, stent)

TAVR vs SAVR selection

AgePreferred approach
<50 yearsSAVR (mechanical preferred unless VKA contraindicated)
50–65 yearsSAVR (mechanical or bioprosthetic — shared decision)
65–80 yearsSAVR or TAVR both acceptable
>80 years or high surgical riskTAVR preferred

Decision requires valve team assessment — STS score, frailty, anatomy, vascular access.


what NOT to do

  • vasodilate symptomatic severe AS — can be fatal
  • use DOACs in rheumatic MS — INVICTUS showed inferiority to warfarin
  • use DOACs with mechanical valves — increased events
  • delay referral for asymptomatic severe AS with LVEF <50% — Class I indication regardless of symptoms
  • attribute exertional symptoms in severe valve disease to deconditioning — exercise stress test if uncertain; symptoms provoked on stress testing = symptomatic patient (Class I for AVR)
  • forget rate control in MS — tachycardia is poorly tolerated
  • assume secondary MR needs surgery first — maximise GDMT and CRT before considering intervention

key trials summary

TrialYearNInterventionKey result
PARTNER 3 (2019)20191000TAVR vs SAVR in low-risk severe ASTAVR non-inferior to SAVR at 1 year; lower rate of composite endpoint
COAPT (2018)2018614MitraClip vs GDMT in secondary MRMitraClip reduced HF hospitalisations and mortality at 2 years
MITRA-FR (2018)2018304MitraClip vs GDMT in secondary MRNo benefit — likely proportionate MR, less optimised GDMT
INVICTUS (2022)20224565rivaroxaban vs warfarin in rheumatic AFrivaroxaban inferior — higher death, stroke, embolism

Key references

All sources (6)