valvular heart disease
Contents
TTE is the initial diagnostic test for all valvular disease. The core clinical question is when to intervene — know the Class I indications for each lesion. Management is largely surgical/interventional once thresholds are met; medical therapy is temporising, not definitive. Prosthetic valve anticoagulation depends on valve type and position.
quick recognition
| Lesion | Classic clue | Auscultation |
|---|---|---|
| aortic stenosis | exertional syncope, angina, dyspnoea in elderly | crescendo-decrescendo systolic murmur → right upper sternal border, radiating to carotids |
| aortic regurgitation | wide pulse pressure, bounding pulses, early diastolic murmur | blowing early diastolic murmur → left sternal border |
| mitral stenosis | rheumatic fever history, AF, haemoptysis | low-pitched diastolic rumble → apex, opening snap |
| mitral regurgitation | holosystolic murmur → axilla, acute MR in MI setting | blowing holosystolic murmur → apex |
aortic stenosis
severity criteria
| Parameter | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Very severe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| peak jet velocity (m/s) | 2.0–2.9 | 3.0–3.9 | ≥4.0 | >5.0 |
| mean gradient (mmHg) | <20 | 20–39 | ≥40 | — |
| AVA (cm²) | >1.5 | 1.0–1.5 | <1.0 | — |
Class I indications for replacement
- severe symptomatic AS (dyspnoea, syncope, angina)
- severe asymptomatic AS with LVEF <50%
- severe asymptomatic AS undergoing other cardiac surgery
- symptomatic low-flow low-gradient AS (reduced or preserved EF) — see below
low-flow low-gradient AS
Two distinct entities:
| classical LFLG | paradoxical LFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| EF | reduced (<50%) | preserved (≥50%) |
| mechanism | LV can’t generate gradient | small hypertrophied LV, low stroke volume |
| diagnostic test | dobutamine stress echo — true severe AS shows AVA stays <1.0 cm² with ↑gradient | CT aortic valve calcium score (dobutamine not helpful — EF already normal) |
| calcium score threshold | — | ≥2000 AU (men), ≥1200 AU (women) suggests true severe AS |
medical management cautions
- avoid vasodilators (ACEi, ARBs, nitrates) in symptomatic severe AS — can precipitate cardiovascular collapse
- avoid excessive preload reduction — these patients are preload-dependent yet vulnerable to pulmonary oedema
- if intubation required: have vasopressors running before induction, minimise PEEP, use haemodynamically stable agents
Not absolutely contraindicated — can be used for hypertension in asymptomatic AS with careful monitoring. The danger is in symptomatic severe disease.
- vasopressor choice: phenylephrine (maintains coronary perfusion, reflexive bradycardia helps diastolic filling) or norepinephrine (mild inotropy without excessive tachycardia)
- avoid tachycardia — shortens diastolic filling time across the fixed obstruction
monitoring (asymptomatic)
| Severity | Echo interval |
|---|---|
| mild | every 3–5 years |
| moderate | every 1–2 years |
| severe | every 6–12 months |
aortic regurgitation
Class I indications for surgery
- severe symptomatic AR
- severe asymptomatic AR with LVEF ≤55%
- severe AR undergoing other cardiac surgery
Class IIa
- severe asymptomatic AR with LV end-systolic dimension >50 mm (or >25 mm/m²)
management
- target SBP <140 mmHg
- standard HFrEF management if LV dysfunction develops
- afterload reduction does not substitute for surgery when thresholds are met
- TAVR is not an option for isolated chronic AR (insufficient calcification for valve anchoring)
mitral stenosis
- almost exclusively rheumatic in origin
- severe MS: MVA ≤1.5 cm²
anticoagulation
INVICTUS (2022) — rivaroxaban was inferior to warfarin in rheumatic heart disease with AF. Higher rates of death, stroke, and systemic embolism.
VKA anticoagulation required if:
- rheumatic MS + AF
- prior embolic event (regardless of rhythm)
- LA thrombus
intervention
PMBC (percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy) — Class I:
- severe symptomatic MS + favourable valve anatomy
Contraindications to PMBC:
- LA thrombus
- greater than moderate MR
- unfavourable anatomy (heavy calcification, subvalvular fusion)
medical management
- rate control is critical — longer diastole = more filling time across the stenotic valve
- diuretics for congestion
- avoid tachycardia (exercise, AF with rapid ventricular response)
mitral regurgitation
primary (degenerative) MR
Pathology of the valve apparatus (leaflets, chordae, papillary muscles). Most common: myxomatous degeneration / mitral valve prolapse. Severe = EROA ≥0.4 cm².
Class I indications for surgery:
- severe symptomatic primary MR
- severe asymptomatic primary MR with LVEF ≤60% or LVESD ≥40 mm
Repair is preferred over replacement when feasible — should be performed at experienced centres with <1% operative mortality.
secondary (functional) MR
Structurally normal leaflets; MR results from LV or LA dilatation causing annular distortion and leaflet malcoaptation. Severe = EROA ≥0.2 cm² (lower threshold than primary MR).
Management sequence:
- maximise GDMT (including SGLT2 Inhibitors, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists)
- CRT if indicated
- percutaneous MV repair (MitraClip) if symptomatic despite maximal GDMT + LVEF 20–50%
COAPT (2018) showed benefit of MitraClip in secondary MR with strict selection (disproportionate MR relative to LV size, on maximal GDMT). MITRA-FR (2018) was neutral — likely enrolled patients with proportionate MR and less optimised medical therapy. Key lesson: patient selection matters.
prosthetic valve anticoagulation
| Valve type | Anticoagulation | Target INR |
|---|---|---|
| mechanical — any position | lifelong Warfarin | — |
| mechanical AVR (current gen, no risk factors) | Warfarin | 2.5 (range 2.0–3.0) |
| mechanical MVR or AVR + risk factors | Warfarin | 3.0 (range 2.5–3.5) |
| ON-X aortic | Warfarin + low-dose ASA | 1.5–2.0 |
| bioprosthetic | lifelong ASA 75–100 mg | — |
| bioprosthetic (post-surgical) | consider VKA INR 2.5 for first 3–6 months | 2.5 |
Increased thrombotic and bleeding events. This is absolute — no exceptions regardless of position.
- add ASA to mechanical valve anticoagulation only if separate antiplatelet indication (e.g. recent ACS, stent)
TAVR vs SAVR selection
| Age | Preferred approach |
|---|---|
| <50 years | SAVR (mechanical preferred unless VKA contraindicated) |
| 50–65 years | SAVR (mechanical or bioprosthetic — shared decision) |
| 65–80 years | SAVR or TAVR both acceptable |
| >80 years or high surgical risk | TAVR preferred |
Decision requires valve team assessment — STS score, frailty, anatomy, vascular access.
what NOT to do
- vasodilate symptomatic severe AS — can be fatal
- use DOACs in rheumatic MS — INVICTUS showed inferiority to warfarin
- use DOACs with mechanical valves — increased events
- delay referral for asymptomatic severe AS with LVEF <50% — Class I indication regardless of symptoms
- attribute exertional symptoms in severe valve disease to deconditioning — exercise stress test if uncertain; symptoms provoked on stress testing = symptomatic patient (Class I for AVR)
- forget rate control in MS — tachycardia is poorly tolerated
- assume secondary MR needs surgery first — maximise GDMT and CRT before considering intervention
key trials summary
| Trial | Year | N | Intervention | Key result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARTNER 3 (2019) | 2019 | 1000 | TAVR vs SAVR in low-risk severe AS | TAVR non-inferior to SAVR at 1 year; lower rate of composite endpoint |
| COAPT (2018) | 2018 | 614 | MitraClip vs GDMT in secondary MR | MitraClip reduced HF hospitalisations and mortality at 2 years |
| MITRA-FR (2018) | 2018 | 304 | MitraClip vs GDMT in secondary MR | No benefit — likely proportionate MR, less optimised GDMT |
| INVICTUS (2022) | 2022 | 4565 | rivaroxaban vs warfarin in rheumatic AF | rivaroxaban inferior — higher death, stroke, embolism |