This content has not yet been reviewed and may contain errors.

approach to eosinophilia

4 min read Updated 2026-07-09
Contents
approach to eosinophilia

Eosinophilia (AEC >0.5 x 10^9/L) — most commonly atopic disease in industrialised nations, helminths worldwide. The critical task: distinguish reactive causes (drugs, infection, allergy) from clonal eosinophilia (myeloid neoplasms with TK fusions) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Persistent AEC >1.5 x 10^9/L demands a structured workup and end-organ damage assessment — cardiac involvement is the major driver of morbidity.

classification

SeverityAEC (x 10^9/L)
Mild0.5–1.5
Moderate1.5–5.0
Severe>5.0
  • Hypereosinophilia (HE): persistent AEC >1.5 x 10^9/L
  • Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES): HE + eosinophil-mediated end-organ damage + exclusion of other causes

differential diagnosis

Mnemonic: NAACP — Neoplasm, Allergy, Autoimmune, Infection (Chronic), Parasites

allergy & drugs (most common in practice)

  • Typically mild eosinophilia with single-system involvement
  • Asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, ABPA, allergic GI disease
  • Drug eosinophilia — NSAIDs, antimicrobials, anticonvulsants
  • DRESS is the severe end: multiorgan involvement, AEC often >1.5 x 10^9/L
  • Elevated IgE is nonspecific (allergic, infectious, and lymphocyte-variant HES)

infection

Most common cause worldwide — tissue-invasive helminths:

  • Strongyloides, Toxocara, Trichinella, Schistosoma, Ascaris, hookworm, filariasis
  • Fungal: Coccidioides, Histoplasma
  • Viral: HIV
  • Strongyloides serology is essential — stool O&P has poor sensitivity for this organism

autoimmune / inflammatory

  • EGPA — the hallmark eosinophilic vasculitis; 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria: AEC ≥1 x 10^9/L (+5), obstructive airway disease (+3), nasal polyps (+3), extravascular eosinophilic inflammation (+2), mononeuritis multiplex (+1); threshold ≥6
  • IBD, coeliac disease, IgG4-related disease, bullous pemphigoid, sarcoidosis, eosinophilic fasciitis

neoplasm (clonal eosinophilia)

Two major categories:

  • MLN-eo-TK (myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and TK gene fusions) — PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1, JAK2. Most common: FIP1L1::PDGFRA (~10% of idiopathic eosinophilia, strong male predominance, exquisitely imatinib-sensitive)
  • CEL-NOS — clonal eosinophilia without a specific TK fusion
  • Other: CML, AML (M4Eo), MDS, CMML, systemic mastocytosis
  • Lymphoid neoplasms (T-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin) → reactive eosinophilia via IL-5/IL-3/GM-CSF

Clonal clues: elevated tryptase, elevated B12, splenomegaly, blasts/dysplasia on smear, abnormal T-cell population

hypereosinophilic syndrome

Diagnosis of exclusion — all three required:

  1. AEC >1.5 x 10^9/L on ≥2 occasions, ≥1 month apart
  2. End-organ damage attributable to eosinophilia
  3. Exclusion of reactive and clonal causes
SubtypeFeaturesTreatment response
Myeloproliferative (M-HES)Anaemia, splenomegaly, elevated B12/tryptase, FIP1L1::PDGFRAImatinib (if PDGFRA+); steroid-refractory
Lymphocyte-variant (L-HES)Aberrant CD3^-CD4^+ T-cells, elevated IgE, skin-predominantGood steroid response
Idiopathic (I-HES)No identifiable causeSteroids first-line

diagnostic algorithm

step 1: history and initial labs

  • Medications (timeline vs eosinophilia onset), travel, atopy, B symptoms
  • CBC with differential, peripheral smear, IgE, CRP

step 2: exclude reactive causes

  • Stool O&P x3 + Strongyloides serology
  • HIV testing
  • Medication review — stop suspect drugs
  • ANA, ANCA (MPO-ANCA most common in EGPA)
  • Imaging as directed by symptoms

step 3: evaluate for clonal disease

Triggered by persistent HE, clonal clues, or failure to identify reactive cause:

  • Serum B12, tryptase
  • FISH: PDGFRA (CHIC2 deletion), PDGFRB, FGFR1, JAK2
  • Bone marrow aspirate/biopsy with cytogenetics, flow cytometry, myeloid NGS panel
  • T-cell immunophenotyping and clonality studies

step 4: assess end-organ damage

OrganKey manifestationsInvestigations
HeartEndomyocardial fibrosis, myocarditis, intracardiac thrombi (acute necrotic → thrombotic → fibrotic)Troponin, NT-proBNP, ECG, echo, cardiac MRI
LungInfiltrates, [[Eosinophilic Lung Diseaseeosinophilic pneumonia]], pleural effusions
SkinRash, pruritus, urticaria, angioedemaBiopsy
GIPain, diarrhoea, eosinophilic gastroenteritisEndoscopy with mucosal biopsies
NeuroBorder-zone stroke, neuropathy, encephalopathyMRI brain, EMG/NCS
cardiac involvement

Troponin and cardiac MRI are the most sensitive early tools — echo may be normal in the acute necrotic phase. Cardiac involvement is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in HES.

management

treat the underlying cause

  • Reactive → antiparasitics, drug withdrawal, treat autoimmune disease
  • Mild eosinophilia (<1.5 x 10^9/L) without organ damage → monitor

clonal disease

  • Imatinib — first-line for PDGFRA-rearranged disease (100 mg daily; exquisite response). Also effective for PDGFRB (100–400 mg daily)
  • Pemigatinib — for relapsed/refractory FGFR1-rearranged neoplasms

HES / idiopathic HE with organ damage

  1. Corticosteroids — first-line for acute end-organ damage, L-HES, idiopathic HES. High-dose IV for cardiac involvement
  2. Mepolizumab (anti-IL-5) 300 mg SC monthly — approved for idiopathic HES refractory to or intolerant of steroids
  3. Hydroxyurea / IFN-alpha — second-line for steroid-refractory disease
  4. Refractory L-HES — alemtuzumab, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib
  5. HSCT — reserved for aggressive/refractory HES and CEL
before starting steroids

Rule out Strongyloides (risk of hyperinfection with immunosuppression) and exclude FIP1L1::PDGFRA (cardiac toxicity reported with steroids in this subtype — imatinib is the correct first-line).

what NOT to do

  • Start steroids without checking Strongyloides serology — hyperinfection syndrome is fatal
  • Assume mild eosinophilia is “just allergies” without a medication review
  • Miss cardiac involvement — always check troponin in persistent HE, even if asymptomatic
  • Delay FISH for PDGFRA in unexplained persistent eosinophilia — imatinib response is dramatic and delays worsen fibrotic damage
  • Forget T-cell immunophenotyping — L-HES is clinically distinct and guides therapy

Key references

All sources (7)