hepatorenal syndrome

8 min read Updated 2026-03-31
Contents
hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI)

Functional renal failure driven by splanchnic vasodilation and systemic inflammation in the setting of portal hypertension — think “AKI on portal hypertension,” not just AKI on cirrhosis. The 2024 ADQI/ICA consensus removed the mandatory 48-hour albumin challenge; vasoconstrictors should be started within 24 hours if volume replete. In Canada, norepinephrine is first-line (terlipressin unavailable). Liver transplantation is definitive treatment.


pathophysiology

core concept

HRS is AKI on portal hypertension. A patient with stable compensated cirrhosis (no ascites) cannot develop HRS.

mechanism:

  1. splanchnic vasodilation — portal hypertension triggers vasodilator release (nitric oxide) in the splanchnic circulation
  2. arterial underfilling — blood pools in the gut, reducing effective arterial blood volume
  3. neurohormonal activation — kidneys perceive hypovolaemia → activate RAAS, sympathetic nervous system, arginine vasopressin
  4. renal vasoconstriction — severe clamping of renal vessels → reduced GFR
  5. systemic inflammation — bacterial translocation and PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns) drive cytokine release, causing microcirculatory dysfunction and direct tubular injury
  6. cirrhotic cardiomyopathy — inability to increase cardiac output in response to stress contributes to renal hypoperfusion

precipitants: infections (SBP is #1), GI bleeding, alcoholic hepatitis, rapid volume depletion (over-diuresis, diarrhoea)

NSAIDs in cirrhosis

Cirrhotic kidneys rely entirely on prostaglandins to maintain afferent arteriolar patency against the high vasoconstrictor drive. NSAIDs remove this defence, precipitating immediate failure.


diagnosis (2024 ADQI/ICA criteria)

A diagnosis of exclusion.

terminology update

  • HRS-AKI — acute form (criteria below)
  • HRS-AKD (acute kidney disease) — HRS lasting <90 days
  • HRS-CKD (chronic kidney disease) — HRS lasting ≥90 days
  • the terms “type 1” and “type 2” are obsolete

establishing baseline creatinine

The ADQI/ICA 2024 consensus recommends this hierarchy:

  1. preferred: lowest stable value in the previous 3 months
  2. alternative: most recent stable value within the last 12 months
  3. if no history: use the lower of admission Cr OR back-calculation using eGFR of 75 mL/min/1.73 m275 \text{ mL/min/1.73 m}^2

diagnostic criteria

staging evolution

Older AASLD criteria (2021) required stage 2 AKI or higher (Cr ≥2× baseline) to diagnose HRS-AKI. The 2024 ADQI/ICA consensus moved away from this strict staging requirement — HRS-AKI can now be diagnosed at any AKI stage, though vasoconstrictor initiation is typically reserved for stage ≥2 or progressive AKI.

To diagnose HRS-AKI, the patient must meet all of the following:

  1. cirrhosis with ascites
  2. AKI diagnosis (KDIGO):
    • increase in serum Cr 26.5 μmol/L\ge 26.5 \text{ } \mu\text{mol/L} within 48h OR 50%\ge 50\% increase from baseline within 7 days
    • and/or urine output 0.5 mL/kg/h\le 0.5 \text{ mL/kg/h} for 6\ge 6 hours (use with caution — baseline UO is often low in cirrhosis)
  3. no response to volume resuscitation within 24 hours:
    • withdraw diuretics and administer albumin (1 g/kg/day1 \text{ g/kg/day}, max 100 g) as the volume challenge
    • if already volume replete (clinical assessment, no evidence of hypovolaemia), initiate vasoconstrictors immediately — do not delay
volume challenge update (2024)

The mandatory 48-hour albumin challenge is removed. Assess response within 24 hours. The key change: a clearly euvolaemic patient should receive vasoconstrictors without waiting for a formal albumin challenge to “fail.”

  1. absence of alternative causes:
    • no shock; no nephrotoxins; no structural signs (proteinuria >500 mg/day, microhaematuria >50 RBC/hpf)

differential diagnosis

diagnostic clues
  • blood pressure: if BP is elevated/normal-high, HRS is unlikely (caveat: average MAP in HRS is ~76 mmHg — consider patient’s baseline)
  • serum Na: normal/high Na (>140 mmol/L) argues against HRS (high ADH should cause hyponatraemia)
featureprerenal AKIATNHRS-AKI
historyfluid lossshock, toxinsworsening portal HTN
urine Na<20 mmol/L>40 mmol/L<10–20 mmol/L
FeNa<1%>1–2%<0.1–0.2%
urinalysisblandmuddy brown castsbland
response to volumeimprovesno improvementno improvement

prevention

The 2024 consensus emphasises “kidney-liver health” assessment to identify risks.

albumin indicated:

  • spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: 1.5 g/kg1.5 \text{ g/kg} day 1, 1.0 g/kg1.0 \text{ g/kg} day 3
  • large volume paracentesis: 68 g6\text{–}8 \text{ g} per litre removed if >5 L removed
albumin NOT indicated
  • systematic use for non-SBP infections (risk of pulmonary oedema with no survival benefit)
  • to correct hypoalbuminaemia solely to maintain levels >30 g/L

management

primary goal: initiate therapy immediately (do not wait 48h if volume replete). Target a rise in MAP of 10–15 mmHg (or to >65 mmHg).

pharmacotherapy

1. norepinephrine — first-line in Canada (terlipressin unavailable)

  • setting: requires ICU admission and central venous access
  • dosing: continuous infusion (0.53 mg/hr0.5\text{–}3 \text{ mg/hr}) titrated to raise MAP by 10–15 mmHg (or target >65 mmHg)
  • evidence: meta-analyses suggest non-inferiority to terlipressin for HRS reversal (Olson, PLoS One. 2024; Pitre, Crit Care Med. 2022)
  • respiratory safety: lower risk of respiratory failure vs terlipressin — β1\beta_1 inotropy allows the heart to compensate for increased afterload, and norepinephrine lacks specific pulmonary vasoconstrictive effects

2. midodrine + octreotide — ward/bridge therapy

  • role: significantly inferior efficacy. Use only if:
    • patient is awaiting ICU transfer (bridge)
    • ICU admission is deemed inappropriate (goals of care)
  • dosing:
    • midodrine: 515 mg5\text{–}15 \text{ mg} PO q8h (titrate to max tolerated BP)
    • octreotide: 100200 μg100\text{–}200 \text{ } \mu\text{g} SC q8h (or 50 μg/hr50 \text{ } \mu\text{g/hr} IV)

3. terlipressin — evidence-based gold standard

  • status: gold standard globally (CONFIRM trial, NEJM 2022), but restricted availability in Canada
  • dosing: continuous IV infusion preferred (start 2 mg/day2 \text{ mg/day}, max 12 mg/day12 \text{ mg/day})
  • mechanism risk vs norepinephrine:
    • terlipressin (V1 agonist): profound systemic vasoconstriction (↑ afterload/SVR) and splanchnic-to-central blood shifting (↑ preload). Lacks inotropic properties → heart cannot compensate → precipitates pulmonary oedema. May cause direct pulmonary venoconstriction
    • norepinephrine (α1+β1\alpha_1 + \beta_1): while also ↑ afterload (α1\alpha_1), β1\beta_1 provides positive inotropy → heart compensates for increased resistance
the CONFIRM trial & albumin warning

The CONFIRM trial showed a high rate of respiratory failure (14% vs 5%). Retrospective analysis suggests this was partly driven by the rigid protocol mandating albumin regardless of volume status — a “two-hit” injury: drug effect (terlipressin ↑ preload/afterload) plus protocol effect (excessive albumin → volume overload). Albumin should be administered only to achieve euvolaemia, then stopped.

terlipressin contraindications
  • respiratory: hypoxia (SpO2SpO_2 <90%) or ACLF grade 3 (≥3 organ failures)
  • renal: serum Cr >440 μ\mumol/L
  • vascular: severe ischaemic disease

adjunctive albumin

  • dosing during vasoconstrictor therapy: 2050 g/day20\text{–}50 \text{ g/day} (AASLD 2021: 1 g/kg1 \text{ g/kg} day 1, then 4050 g/day40\text{–}50 \text{ g/day}; lower end 2040 g/day20\text{–}40 \text{ g/day} may be appropriate depending on volume status)
  • diagnostic challenge (older criteria): 1 g/kg/day1 \text{ g/kg/day} × 2 days (max 100 g/day) — no longer mandatory under 2024 criteria
albumin safety

Dose must be adjusted daily. Stop immediately if signs of volume overload or pulmonary oedema develop.

“no BP, no PP”

Diuretics often fail in HRS. Once MAP is raised by vasoconstrictors, diuretics can be reintroduced to manage volume overload.

stopping rules

discontinue therapy if:

  1. success: serum Cr returns to within 26.5 μmol/L26.5 \text{ } \mu\text{mol/L} of baseline
  2. futility: no improvement after 4 days on maximum tolerated dose (AASLD 2021)
  3. safety: severe adverse reaction (ischaemia, pulmonary oedema)
  4. duration: maximum 14 days

other interventions

  • TIPS: not recommended for HRS-AKI (risk of heart failure/liver ischaemia)
  • beta-blockers: hold when MAP <65 mmHg or AKI develops (AASLD 2021); reassess after recovery

transplant & prognosis

Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment. The decision to include a kidney (simultaneous liver-kidney or SLK) depends on whether the renal failure is deemed irreversible.

MELD score consideration

HRS-AKI treatment may lower MELD scores (improved Cr), potentially disadvantaging transplant prioritisation. Some jurisdictions (including Canadian transplant programmes) maintain pre-treatment MELD scores for listing purposes to avoid penalising patients who respond to vasoconstrictors.

SLK listing criteria (defining “irreversibility”)

HRS-CKD (chronic permanent damage):

  • renal dysfunction lasting >90 days
  • SLK criterion: eGFR ≤60 mL/min for >90 days plus (ESRD on dialysis or eGFR ≤30 at listing)

HRS-AKD (prolonged acute/subacute damage):

  • renal dysfunction lasting 7–90 days
  • SLK criterion: sustained AKI (dialysis or eGFR ≤25 mL/min) for ≥6 consecutive weeks
  • rationale: after 6 weeks of deep renal failure, native recovery post-liver transplant is highly unlikely

safety net policy

For patients with HRS-AKI or HRS-AKD who do not meet the 6-week SLK cutoff but receive a liver transplant alone:

  • if they remain on dialysis or have eGFR <20 mL/min between 60–365 days post-transplant → priority access to a kidney transplant

prognosis & palliative care

For patients with HRS-AKI who are not transplant candidates:

  • with dialysis: survival typically 3–6 months (often a “bridge to nowhere”)
  • without dialysis: survival measured in days to weeks
  • even vasoconstrictor responders have high short-term mortality without transplant — HRS-AKI should trigger urgent transplant evaluation in all eligible patients
  • in severe HRS-AKI, systemic BP is often too low to tolerate haemodialysis (intradialytic hypotension), making RRT technically impossible

post-discharge follow-up

  • goal: detect transition from HRS-AKI (reversible) → HRS-CKD (permanent)
  • action: assess “kidney-liver health” within 1 month of discharge
  • tool: use cystatin C where possible; serum creatinine underestimates dysfunction due to sarcopenia

Key references

All sources (14)