stable angina & chronic coronary syndromes

5 min read Updated 2026-03-25
Contents
stable angina & chronic coronary syndromes

Predictable exertional chest discomfort due to fixed epicardial coronary stenosis. Optimal medical therapy is non-inferior to revascularisation for most stable patients — COURAGE (2007), ORBITA (2018), ISCHEMIA (2020). The role of investigation is to risk-stratify, not just confirm disease.


ischaemic cascade

With increasing ischaemic duration, abnormalities appear in a predictable sequence:

  1. perfusion abnormality (seen on myocardial perfusion imaging)
  2. diastolic dysfunction → systolic dysfunction (wall motion abnormalities)
  3. ECG changes (ST depression/elevation)
  4. symptoms (angina)
  5. myocardial necrosis (troponin release)
exam relevance

This explains why nuclear perfusion imaging is more sensitive than ECG stress testing — it detects the earliest stage of ischaemia. It also explains why “silent ischaemia” (abnormal perfusion/wall motion without symptoms) is real and clinically significant.


diagnosis — choosing the right test

All stable CAD patients require resting LVEF imaging (e.g. TTE) — CCS 2014.

functional testing (non-invasive stress tests)

Two components to every stress test:

ComponentOptions
Stressexercise (preferred) or pharmacologic (dobutamine, vasodilators)
TestECG alone, ECG + echo, ECG + nuclear (SPECT)

Choosing the stress modality:

  • exercise whenever possible — provides prognostic data (METs achieved, duration, haemodynamic response)
  • pharmacologic if unable to exercise adequately

Choosing the imaging modality:

  • ECG alone if baseline ECG is interpretable
  • add imaging (echo or nuclear) if ECG uninterpretable: LBBB, paced rhythm, pre-excitation, significant baseline ST changes
  • RBBB is generally interpretable on stress ECG

structural testing

  • coronary angiography (invasive) — gold standard, therapeutic option
  • CT coronary angiography (CCTA) — for low-to-intermediate pre-test probability; less accurate with heavy calcification or prior stents; contraindicated in ACS

coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring

  • for asymptomatic intermediate-risk patients (FRS 10–19%) aged >40 not otherwise statin candidates
  • CAC >100 → statin indicated regardless of FRS
  • not a diagnostic test for symptomatic patients

absolute contraindications to exercise stress testing

Mnemonic: I DO NOT STRESS

LetterContraindication
Iinflammation (myocarditis, pericarditis)
Ddissection (aortic)
Oongoing angina
Nno consent
Oongoing MI (within 2 days)
Tthrombosis (acute PE/DVT)
Ssevere AS (symptomatic)
Ttechnical issues / physical limitations
Rrhythm (uncontrolled haemodynamically significant arrhythmia)
Eendocarditis (active)
Ssystolic dysfunction (decompensated HF)
Sslow (physical limitations)

high-risk features on exercise stress testing

  • Duke Treadmill Score ≤ −11
  • <5 METs achieved
  • ST elevation or severe ST depression ≥2 mm
  • ischaemia on ≥5 leads or persisting ≥3 min into recovery
  • abnormal BP response: failure to reach SBP >120, drop >10 mmHg, or drop below baseline
  • ventricular arrhythmia

pharmacologic vasodilator stress — key points

  • mechanism: vasodilation of normal coronary arteries reveals perfusion mismatch in territories supplied by diseased vessels (coronary steal)
  • false negatives: caffeine/theophylline (must hold before test), balanced triple-vessel or left main disease
  • contraindicated: high-grade AV block, active/severe asthma or COPD
  • reversal agent: aminophylline

management of chronic stable CAD

disease-modifying therapies (all patients)

  • ASA + statin — backbone for all coronary atherosclerosis
  • clopidogrel if ASA intolerant — CAPRIE (1996)
  • ACEi if HTN, T2DM, LVEF <40%, or CKD
  • beta-blocker if LVEF <40% (no MACE reduction if no prior MI and LVEF >50% — ACC/AHA 2023)
  • SGLT2 Inhibitors or GLP-1RA if CAD + diabetes

antianginal therapies (symptom relief)

ClassNotes
beta-blockersreduce HR and contractility — first-line antianginal
CCBs (non-DHP)verapamil, diltiazem — caution if LVEF <40%
CCBs (DHP)amlodipine — safe with reduced EF
nitratesvenodilate, reduce LVEDP — symptom relief only

lifestyle and adjunctive

  • smoking cessation — counselling + pharmacotherapy together more effective than either alone
  • cardiac rehab (class I-A post-MI/PCI/CABG; class I-B stable CAD)
  • exercise: ≥150 min/wk aerobic + 2 days/wk resistance
  • vaccines: annual influenza (I-C), COVID (I-C), pneumococcal (II-a)
what NOT to recommend

Dietary supplements, alcohol for CV protection, chronic NSAIDs — all lack evidence or cause harm in CAD.


revascularisation

OMT is non-inferior to revascularisation for most stable CAD — COURAGE (2007), ORBITA (2018), ISCHEMIA (2020).

when CABG offers survival benefit over medical therapy or PCI

ScenarioBenefit of CABG
left main >50% stenosissurvival benefit over GDMT alone
multivessel disease + LVEF ≤35%survival benefit over PCI
left main with high-complexity CADsurvival benefit + less repeat revascularisation vs PCI
multivessel + diabetes + LAD involvementsurvival benefit + less repeat revascularisation vs PCI

key trials summary

TrialYearKey finding
COURAGE (2007)2007PCI + OMT no better than OMT alone for death/MI in stable CAD
ORBITA (2018)2018PCI did not improve exercise time vs sham procedure in stable angina
ISCHEMIA (2020)2020Invasive strategy did not reduce death/MI vs conservative in moderate-severe ischaemia
CAPRIE (1996)1996Clopidogrel modestly superior to ASA in atherosclerotic vascular disease

Key references

All sources (6)