hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

3 min read Updated 2026-03-25
Contents
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Most common inherited cardiac condition (~1:500). Caused by sarcomere protein gene variants producing asymmetric septal hypertrophy, dynamic LVOT obstruction, and diastolic dysfunction. Main risks: sudden cardiac death (especially young athletes), AF with thromboembolism, and progressive HF. Management centres on symptom control, SCD risk stratification, and family screening.


pathophysiology

  • genetic: autosomal dominant, sarcomere protein variants (MYH7, MYBPC3 most common)
  • asymmetric septal hypertrophy → dynamic LVOT obstruction (LVOTO) in ~70%
  • systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve → LVOTO + mitral regurgitation
  • diastolic dysfunction → elevated filling pressures → exertional dyspnoea
  • myocardial fibrosis → arrhythmia substrate → VT/VF risk

diagnosis

  • echo: wall thickness ≥15 mm (or ≥13 mm with family history or positive genotype) not explained by loading conditions
  • cardiac MRI: characterise hypertrophy pattern, detect apical variants (missed on echo), quantify LGE (fibrosis = arrhythmia risk)
  • genetic testing: offered to all patients; guides family screening
  • provocative testing: Valsalva, standing, exercise echo — unmask latent LVOTO (resting gradient may be <30 mmHg)

screening first-degree relatives

  • clinical screening (echo + ECG) every 1–2 years from age 12 (or earlier if competitive athlete or family history of early SCD)
  • if gene-positive / phenotype-negative: annual echo + ECG
  • genetic cascade screening if pathogenic variant identified in proband

LVOT obstruction management

provocation and avoidance

LVOTO worsens with anything that reduces preload, reduces afterload, or increases contractility:

Worsen obstructionImprove obstruction
dehydration, Valsalva, standingvolume loading, squatting, leg elevation
vasodilators (nitrates, dihydropyridines)phenylephrine (acute)
exercise, post-prandial
positive inotropes (digoxin, dobutamine)negative inotropes (BB, non-DHP CCB)
avoid in obstructive HCM

Nitrates, dihydropyridine CCBs, ACEi/ARBs (if significant obstruction), digoxin, IV inotropes (dobutamine/milrinone). These reduce afterload or increase contractility → worsen SAM and LVOTO.

pharmacotherapy

LineAgentNotes
1stbeta-blocker (non-vasodilating)reduce HR, contractility, and gradient; titrate to effect
1stnon-DHP CCB (verapamil)alternative or add-on to BB; avoid if resting gradient >100 mmHg or severe HF
2nddisopyramidepotent negative inotrope; must combine with BB or CCB (disopyramide has vagolytic effect → may increase AV conduction)
2ndmavacamtencardiac myosin inhibitor — EXPLORER-HCM (2020); reduces gradient, improves symptoms; monitor LVEF (hold if <50%); alternative to septal reduction

septal reduction therapy

  • if refractory symptoms despite maximal medical therapy + resting or provoked gradient ≥50 mmHg
  • surgical myectomy (gold standard) or alcohol septal ablation (if not surgical candidate)
  • mavacamten may defer or avoid septal reduction — VALOR-HCM (2023)

atrial fibrillation

AF in HCM — anticoagulate regardless of CHA₂DS₂-VASc

CHADS-65 / CHA₂DS₂-VASc risk scores do not apply in HCM. Any AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent) warrants OAC — the thromboembolic risk is inherently high due to LA enlargement, diastolic dysfunction, and stasis.

  • DOACs preferred over warfarin
  • rhythm control often pursued (AF poorly tolerated due to loss of atrial kick in stiff ventricle)

sudden cardiac death risk stratification

class I indication for ICD

  • prior cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia

class IIa — consider ICD (≥1 major risk factor)

Risk factor
maximal wall thickness ≥30 mm
family history of SCD from HCM
unexplained syncope
apical aneurysm
LVEF <50% (end-stage / burnt-out HCM)
  • use the HCM Risk-SCD calculator (ESC) to guide 5-year SCD risk estimation
  • exercise stress testing can unmask arrhythmias (NSVT on Holter is an additional risk factor)
exam relevance

SCD risk assessment is a common exam scenario. Know the major risk factors and that a single risk factor in context may warrant ICD. The threshold is lower than for ischaemic cardiomyopathy — no “3-month GDMT trial” required.

Key references

All sources (4)