heart failure — diagnosis & classification

3 min read Updated 2026-03-25
Contents
heart failure — diagnosis & classification

Syndrome of impaired ventricular filling or ejection causing dyspnoea, fatigue, and fluid retention. Classification by LVEF drives therapy: HFrEF (≤40%) has robust mortality-reducing GDMT; HFnrEF (>40%) has fewer proven interventions. Every HF patient needs an echocardiogram, an aetiological workup, and congestion assessment.


classification by LVEF — updated terminology (Oct 2025)

CategoryLVEFOld termNotes
HFrEF≤40%HFrEFquadruple therapy backbone
HFnrEF>40%HFmrEF (41–49%) + HFpEF (≥50%)merged — ESC/CCS 2025
why the change?

The HFmrEF/HFpEF distinction lacked therapeutic relevance — no drug has different efficacy across the >40% spectrum. Simplifies trial design and clinical decision-making.


NYHA functional classification

ClassDescription
Ino limitation of physical activity
IIslight limitation — comfortable at rest, symptoms with ordinary activity
IIImarked limitation — comfortable at rest, symptoms with less than ordinary activity
IVsymptoms at rest — unable to carry on any activity without discomfort

baseline investigations — all heart failure

TestRationale
ECGrhythm, conduction (LBBB for CRT eligibility), LVH, prior MI
TTELVEF, chamber size, valves, diastolic function, wall motion, pericardium
BNP / NT-proBNPdiagnosis (BNP >100, NT-proBNP >300 suggest HF); prognostication; response to therapy
troponinrule out ACS as precipitant
CBCanaemia (common comorbidity / decompensation trigger)
lytes, Cr, ureabaseline renal function; guide GDMT initiation and monitoring
ferritin + TSATiron deficiency common and treatable (even without anaemia)
TSHhyper/hypothyroidism as reversible cause
lipids + HbA1cCV risk management; SGLT2i eligibility regardless of diabetes

aetiological workup

coronary artery disease assessment

  • non-invasive ischaemia testing for all new HF — rule in/out ischaemic aetiology
  • coronary angiography if:
    • HF with angina
    • LVEF ≤35% (revascularisation may improve outcomes in ischaemic cardiomyopathy)
    • high pre-test probability of CAD

cardiac MRI

Indicated for non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy — helps distinguish:

FindingSuggests
mid-wall or epicardial LGEmyocarditis, sarcoidosis, DCM
subendocardial LGE in coronary distributionischaemic cardiomyopathy
diffuse subendocardial or RV LGEamyloidosis
fatty infiltration + RV wall motion abnormalitiesARVC
increased native T1/T2oedema (active inflammation), infiltration
when to get cardiac MRI

New non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, suspected infiltrative disease (amyloid, sarcoid), suspected ARVC, myocarditis, or when echo is non-diagnostic.


precipitants of decompensation

Mnemonic: FAILURES

LetterCause
Fforgot medications (non-adherence)
Aarrhythmia (AF most common), anaemia
Iischaemia / infarction, infection
Llifestyle (dietary Na/fluid excess)
Uupregulation (pregnancy, thyrotoxicosis)
Rrenal failure
Eembolism (PE)
Sstenosis (aortic) or other valvular progression

assessing congestion and perfusion — the Nohria–Stevenson classification

warm (adequate perfusion)cold (hypoperfusion)
dry (no congestion)warm & dry — compensated (profile A)cold & dry — may need inotropes/volume (profile L)
wet (congested)warm & wet — diuretics (profile B)cold & wet — most dangerous; inotropes + diuretics (profile C)
cold & wet (profile C)

Cardiogenic shock phenotype. Needs HF specialist involvement, often inotropes or MCS. Do NOT rely on diuretics alone — inadequate cardiac output limits renal drug delivery.

Key references